Wed, Jul. 13th, 2005, 11:39 pm never forget: many journalists are useless little shits
Remember the hoohah about Laura telling George to pick a woman for the Supreme Court? cjrcampaigndesk talks it down: At one point during an interview yesterday with the First Lady, NBC's Ann Curry asked Mrs. Bush, "Let me shift to a topic that a lot of Americans care a lot about. That is what will happen in the wake of Sandra Day O'Connor retiring. Do you want your husband to name another woman?" Mrs. Bush smiled and replied, "Sure. I would really like for him to name another woman, but -- and I admire and respect Sandra Day O'Connor so much. She's been a friend that I've loved seeing whenever I've had the chance when -- when I'm in Washington. But I know that my husband will pick somebody who has -- has a lot of integrity and strength and whether it's a woman or a man, of course, I have no idea. But -- but I'm proud that Sandra Day O'Connor was the first woman on the Supreme Court." So... yeah. That's all. Return to your homes and, thanks to journalists who've rediscovered their calling, take a shot every time Scotty McClellan says "ongoing investigation."
Thu, Jul. 14th, 2005 12:21 pm (UTC)
loosechanj: take a shot every time Scotty McClellan says "ongoing investigation."

I don't have that much money. Hell, the world doesn't have that much alcohol.
Thu, Jul. 14th, 2005 03:39 pm (UTC)
frosch
thanks to journalists who've rediscovered their calling,Bah. If they'd rediscovered their calling, they'd be asking "what did he do?", not "is the President going to fire him?". Meanwhile, the buzz on the streets of Mount Rozell, Alabama, is that the 2008 Presidential contest will be Laura v. Hillary and will feature a cage match.
Thu, Jul. 14th, 2005 05:08 pm (UTC)
ronebofh

We KNOW what he did. There's no point in asking that, especially due to the ongoing investigation. [drinks] I would bet my car against a Laura Bush nomination.
Thu, Jul. 14th, 2005 09:32 pm (UTC)
frosch
We KNOW what he did.Rove's version of the story is that he had no idea Plame was undercover, because she drives to Langley alla time yadda yadda yadda. This is going to turn out to be no more prosecutable than Sandy Berger walking out of the National Archives with secret documents stuffed in his drawers, unless somebody can come up with proof that Rove wasn't just repeating K-street espresso-line gossip.
Thu, Jul. 14th, 2005 09:35 pm (UTC)
ronebofh

Wikipedia says: "On April 1, 2005, in connection with the documents investigation, Berger pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material. Under a plea agreement, he was fined $10,000 and lost his security clearance for three years." Sounds pretty damn prosecutable to me.
Fri, Jul. 15th, 2005 02:50 pm (UTC)
frosch

yeah, I knew I was on shaky ground there. The NYT is reporting today, though, that Rove merely confirmed what Novak told him, Novak having either made it up himself or heard it from someone else. Look, I don't like any of these guys. I even cheered when I heard they'd sent Judy Miller to jail. But I'll bet she's the only one who goes to jail over this whole thing. Nobody has anything on Rove that will stand up, and nobody is going to get it by standing in the East Wing making a show of asking Li'l' Scotty tough questions.
Fri, Jul. 15th, 2005 04:14 pm (UTC)
ronebofh

Just the shift from a docile, tame press to a bunch of capering, nosy journalists should be enough to make them nervous. I doubt Rove'll go to jail, but i can see him getting fined, like Berger.
|
|